IN TH 234 Amandeep Daljit Sing CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU seeking en Motor Acc ₹75,000/- motor vehi consecutive adjournmen service upo and comple to the appe report “hou FAO-3874-2009 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR FAO No.3874 of Date of decision ndeep Singh Versus it Singh and another AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. C.L. Verma, Advocate for the appellant. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The present appeal has been ing enhancement of the compensatio r Accident Claims Tribunal, Ludh - was granted on account of the in r vehicular accident dated 01.06.2003. A perusal of the order sheets r ecutive dates, learned counsel for the rnments for filing an appropriate a ce upon respondents No.1 and 2, on th omplete addresses are not available. As per the office report dated e appellant himself has been receive rt “house found locked”. It is also bor 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 874 of 2009 (O & M) cision :-24.03.2026 …..Appellant …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA been preferred by the claimant nsation awarded by the learned Ludhiana, whereby a sum of the injuries sustained by him in a .2003. heets reveals that on the last three or the appellant has been seeking riate application for substituted , on the ground that their correct t dated 05.02.2025, notice issued received back unserved with the so borne out from the record that VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.01 16.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document despite rep effecting lapse of mo of service submits th contact wit quite some behalf of th considered be an exe indicates a inordinate d proceeding abandoned prosecutio of. March 24 Monika/Vija Whether spea Whether Repo FAO-3874-2009 (O & M) ite repeated opportunities, requisite ste service upon the respondents for w The appeal pertains to the ye of more than 17 years, the matter re rvice of respondents. Learned couns its that despite best efforts, he has act with the appellant and no instructi some time. It is further stated that no lf of the appellant to pursue the presen In the aforesaid circumstanc idered view that issuance of fresh not n exercise in futility. The conduct ates a lack of interest in prosecutin inate delay, coupled with the absence eedings, compels this Court to concl doned the lis. Accordingly, the present appea ecution. Pending application(s), if any 4, 2026 Vijay Asija r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 site steps have not been taken for ts for want of proper particulars. the year 2009 and, even after a tter remains pending at the stage counsel for the appellant fairly e has been unable to establish structions have been received for that no one has come forward on present appeal. mstances, this Court is of the sh notice to the appellant would onduct of the appellant clearly ecuting the present appeal. The sence of any steps to advance the conclude that the appellant has t appeal is dismissed for want of if any, shall also stand disposed ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.01 16.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document