Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2009 DAILYLAW 2330 (PNJ)

SURESH KUMAR AND ORS. v. HARNAM SINGH AND ORS.

FAO/2256/2009 · 2026-04-08

Nidhi Gupta

body2009

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 215-II Sri Suresh Harnam S CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU appellant/c the learned an amount a claim pet Vehicles A fresh notice service be e area. the Mediati FAO-2256-2009 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR FAO No.2256 of Date of decision uresh Kumar Versus am Singh and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the appellant. Ms. Pratula Sethi, Advocate fo Insurance Company. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The present appeal has /claimant against the Award date earned Motor Accident Claims Tribu ount of Rs.9000/- has been awarded im petition filed under Sections 166 cles Act. Vide order dated 21.4.2025, notices be issued to the appellants as ce be effected upon the parties through Vide order dated 24.7.2025, diation and Conciliation Centre. 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH of 2009 (O & M) cision :-08.04.2026 …..Appellant …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA cate for the respondent No.4- has been filed by the rd dated 22/23.7.2006 passed by Tribunal, Kurukshetra, whereby arded by way of compensation in s 166, 140 and 141 of the Motor .2025, it has been directed that nts as well as the respondents and hrough the SHO of the concerned 2025, the matter was referred to VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.10 17.51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document the sole app on behalf o deceased- would be a 2009 and i appeal befo of the dece no attempt engage a ne the instant deceased- period of 0 as mention April 08, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo FAO-2256-2009 (O & M) Although report dated 07.4.20 ole appellant has died. In the aforesaid premise, since ehalf of appellant, notices could not b -appellant and issuance of fresh d be a futile exercise. However, this a and it appears that due to sheer long al before this Court for a period of mo e deceased-appellant have lost interes ttempt has been made by them to co ge a new counsel. Be that as it may, in view of th instant appeal is disposed of, with -appellant, to move an appropr d of 02 months from today for revivin Copy of this order be sent to t entioned in the Memo of Parties. Pending application(s), if any, , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 07.4.2026 has been received that since there is no representation not be issued to the LRs of the f fresh notice to the appellant , this appeal pertains to the year er long pendency of the present of more than 16 years, the LRs interest in pursuing the same, as to contact their counsel or to w of the foregoing circumstances, with liberty to the LRs of the ppropriate application within a eviving the same, if so, advised. nt to the address of the appellant if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.10 17.51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document