IN TH 214 Anant Ram Inder Sing CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU concurrent by the plai by both the following o RSA-3303-2009 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal No.33 Date of decision :-30.03.202 nt Ram and another Versus r Singh and another AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the appellants. Mr. Shubham Malik, Advocate Mr. Jagjeet Beniwal, Advocate HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The plaintiffs have filed the urrent findings of the learned Courts b e plaintiffs/appellants herein for decla oth the Courts below. The matter pertains to the year On the last date of heari wing order was passed by this Court : “The present sec by the plaintiff against and decrees of the lear the suit filed by the app been dismissed by both A written request made by the appellants by learned counsel fo submits that the present 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH No.3303 of 2009 (O & M) .2026 …..Appellants …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA vocate for vocate for respondent No.1. d the present appeal against the urts below whereby the suit filed r declaration, has been dismissed e year 2009. hearing i.e. 03.12.2025, the ourt :- t second appeal has been filed ainst the concurrent judgments learned Courts below, whereby appellants for declaration has oth the Courts below. uest for adjournment has been lants. The same is objected to el for respondent No.1, who sent appeal is of the year 2009, VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.02 18.16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document appellants t appellants the present time of the appellants have adopt neither the pursuing th option exce March 30 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo RSA-3303-2009 (O & M) in which notice of mo 21.5.2012. Thereafte adjourned repeatedly at for the appellants. It is is a 12th or 13th writte circulated on behalf of t Order sheets sho learned counsel for resp As such, last o learned counsel for t arguments. Adjourned to 30.3 Despite the said order, non llants to address arguments. A bare reading of the abo s have exhibited an utterly casua resent litigation. It is to be appreciate of the Court has been expended in aff s in the interest of justice. On the adopted an utterly casual and careles er the appellants nor their counsel ing the present matter. Thus, this C n except to dismiss the same for non Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, 30, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 f motion was issued only on eafter, the matter has been ly at request of learned counsel It is submitted that the present ritten request for adjournment f of the appellants. shows the said submission of respondent No.1 to be correct. st opportunity is granted to or the appellants to address 30.3.2026.” r, none appears on behalf of e above facts shows that the casual attitude in the pursuit of reciated that very valuable public in affording opportunities to the On the other hand, the appellants areless approach. It is clear that unsel are seriously interested in this Court is left with no other r non-prosecution. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.02 18.16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document