CRM-M-34770 216 IN THE HARPAL SING STATE OF PU CORAM:- HO Present:- M Mr
*** AMARJOT BH 1. Pet of   in FIR No.137 Nyaya Sanhita, 2. As that she is moth on 02.04.2009 12.07.2024 she job. Her son ha for some reason the victim was her whereabout 34770-2025 -1- THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34770-2025 Date of Decision:- 13. SINGH @ LADDI Vs. F PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMA Mr. Manjot Singh, Advocate and Mr.Lovish Rattan, Advocate for the

     ***** OT BHATTI, J. Petitioner has filed instant second    o.137 dated 12.07.2024 under Section nhita, 2023 registered at Police Station As per facts of the case, complaina s mother of two sons and a daughter. H .2009 who was studying in 9th class 4 she and her husband had gone ou on had gone to school and her daught reason. At about 4 pm, Rajbir Kaur as not present in the house. She re eabouts but could not locate her. Co JAB AND HARYANA 2025 13.01.2026 ....Petitioner ...Respondent AMARJOT BHATTI e and for the petitioner.  econd petition under Section 482  for grant of anticipatory bail Sections 137 (2), 87 of Bharatiya Station Kamboj, District Amritsar. plainant ‘KK’ gave her statement hter. Her daughter ‘SK’ was born class in Mayflower School. On ne out for doing their respective daughter ‘SK’ did not go to school Kaur informed on telephone that She returned home and looked for er. Complainant suspected Laddi SANDEEP KUMAR 2026.01.15 13:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-34770 Singh for taking With these alleg Du she was hande under Section refused for her going on. 3. Le leveled against friendly with relationship and tried to break c common friend case. He is you was wrongly d Court, Amritsa petition (CRM 08.04.2025 is A and will abide b 4. De representing Sta 14.01.2025 vid joining of inve ultimately said There are spec 34770-2025 -2- taking away her daughter by giving f e allegations, present FIR has been reg During investigation, victim was re handed over to her parents. Stateme ction 183     or her medical examination. Invest Learned counsel for the petition gainst him are false. Few days prior with each other. Complainant cam and they were threatened not to reak contact but the victim contacted friend on social network. Petitioner i is young boy of 23 years of age. His ngly declined by learned Additional mritsar vide order dated 12.11.2024. (CRM-M-1384-2025) was withdraw 5 is Annexure P-4. Petitioner is rea bide by the terms and conditions of ba Detailed status report has bee ing State referred to the previous orde 5 vide which the arrest of the petiti f investigation. Petitioner did not y said anticipatory bail petition was e specific serious allegations against iving false assurance of marriage. egistered. as recovered on 16.07.2024 and tatement of victim was recorded     . She had stigation in this case is still etitioner argued that allegations prior to the occurrence, they got nt came to know about their ot to meet each other. Petitioner tacted him time and again through ioner is falsely implicated in this . His anticipatory bail application ional Sessions Judge, Fast Track .2024. His first anticipatory bail hdrawn. Copy of order dated is ready to join the investigation s of bail order. s been filed. Learned counsel s order passed by this Court dated petitioner was stayed subject to not join the investigation and was dismissed as withdrawn. ainst the petitioner. He is yet to SANDEEP KUMAR 2026.01.15 13:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-34770 join the invest declined. 5. I h petitioner was dated 14.01.20 withdrawn by (Annexure P-4) anticipatory ba petitioner is spe was minor. Sh recorded under Matter is still u thereafter the in factual position same is accordi Pen 13.01.2026 s
      " 34770-2025 -3- investigation. Therefore, his anticipa I have considered the arguments. was granted interim relief in CRM 01.2025. Later-on said first antic n by learned counsel representing 4). Petitioner did not abide by th ry bail petition. So far as allegatio is specifically named. At the time of or. She was recovered on 16.07.20 under Section 183    still under investigation as petitione the investigation will be completed. sition, I do not find a fit case for grant ccordingly declined. Pending misc. application, if any, s (A  ! # $  "  # $  nticipatory bail petition may be ments. It is matter of record that CRM-M-1384-2025 vide order anticipatory bail petition was enting petitioner on 08.04.2025 by the directions passed in first legations are concerned, present ime of alleged occurrence, victim .07.2024. Her statement is also      . titioner is yet to be arrested and leted. Considering the aforesaid grant of anticipatory bail and the any, stands disposed of. (AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE SANDEEP KUMAR 2026.01.15 13:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document