IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-11700-2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.01.2026 TEK CHAND ...Petitioner Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present:- Mr. Pankaj Jain, Sr. Advocate (through V.C.) with Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate and Mr. Yogesh Kumar Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sourabh Kapoor, Advocate, Mr. Rana Gurtej Singh, Advocate, Ms. Muskaan Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Tanya Kumar, Advocate and Ms. Muskan Chauhan, Advocate for the respondent *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to grant interest and interest on interest on the amount seized and withheld illegally by respondent. 2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not press the instant petition. 3. Dismissed as not pressed. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE January 15, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.01.16 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document