105 IN TH Civil Pancha The Punjab CORAM: Present: HARKESH well as GMA the judgmen appeals, lea Punjab Ve preferred at dismissed, w the learned [2] [3] Chand’s ca Court agre respondent [4] same terms [5] disposed off
May 04, 20 ‘dk kamra’

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR RFA No Date of anchayat, Kambali, Tehsil Mohali, Di Versus unjab State and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HAR None for the appellant. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Additional A for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Raj Kumar Rathore, Advoc for respondent Nos. 4 to 9, 11 Mr. Maninder Singh Garcha, S Ms. Mehak Kanwar, Advocate **** KESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel GMADA submit(s) that the present ap dgment dated 05.11.2009 passed by ls, lead case of which was RFA No. Versus Gurdial Chand and oth red at the instance of landowners as sed, while maintaining the determina rned Reference Court. No one appears on behalf of After going through the jud s case (supra) as well as the fact agrees with the assertion of the dent(s)/GMADA. Consequently, the present a terms as Gurdial Chand’s case (supr Pending miscellaneous applica ed off. , 2026        UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH FA No. 628 of 2001 (O&M) ate of Decision: 04.05.2026 Distt. Ropar ...Appellant ...Respondents HARKESH MANUJA ional Advocate General, Punjab Advocate 9, 11 & 13. ha, Sr. Advocate, assisted by ocate, for the PUDA/GMADA unsel(s) for the respondent(s) as ent appeal is squarely covered by ed by this Court in a bunch of o. 2378 of 2000, titled “State of others”, whereby the appeals rs as well as by the State were rmination of the market value by lf of the appellant. e judgment passed in Gurdial e facts of the present case, this f the learned counsel for the ent appeal is dismissed in the supra). pplication(s), if any, shall stand(s) ( HARKESH MANUJA ) JUDGE
  DINESH KUMAR 2026.05.06 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document