RSA-471-20 IN THE HIG 222 Sohan Singh Darshan Sing CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. judgment of District Judg filed by the and decree d declaration 2. hearing i.e. 0 2009 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o Singh Versus an Singh M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Ashok Pruthi, Advocate for the appellant (through V.C.) I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant-defendant is in ent of reversal dated 22.04.2008 pass t Judge (Adhoc), Fast Track Court, J y the plaintiff/respondent was allowe cree dated 09.10.2007 passed by the le ation filed by the respondent-plaintiff The matter pertains to the yea i.e. 06.05.2025, following order has “Learned counsel for the old matter pertains to the year efforts they are not able to clients, hence, pray for issua parties. In the interest of justice notice be issued to the parties also made an effort through th village as well as SHO of the co upon the parties, so that effect of the matter.” ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-471-2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.05.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA C.). is in second appeal against the passed by the learned Additional ourt, Jalandhar whereby the appeal allowed, setting aside the judgment y the learned trial Court; and suit for intiff was decreed. he year 2009. On the last date of er has been passed by this Court:- r the parties submit that this is an year 2009 and despite their best to establish contact with their issuance of fresh notices to the stice, let actual date of hearing rties for 02.2.2026. Registry shall h the Sarpanch of the concerned he concerned area to effect service ffect steps can be taken to dispose the onal peal ent t for e of an est eir he ng all ed ice se RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 19:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-471-20 3. has been rec 4. the appellant the present years, the ap has been ma appellant is 5. disposed of 6. 05.05.2026 rishu 2009 (O&M) -2- Pursuant thereto, following of en received:- Sole Appellant Gone A R. No. 1(i) to 1(iii) through attorney Sandeep Singh Gone A 2011 i Bench respond Notice issued to parties throug report “Refused to accept noti area”. Notice issued to parties throug official of concerned area.” In view of the aforesaid premis pellant would be a futile exercise. It ap esent second appeal before this Cou the appellant has lost interest in purs en made by him to contact his counsel is not seriously interested in pursui Be that as it may, the insta ed of. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable office report dated 29.01.2026 ne Abroad ne Abroad, However cm-9708-C- 11 is pending before Hon;’ble nch for impleading Lrs of sole pondent. rough Sarpanch is received with notice by Sarpanch of concerned rough SHO is received by Police premise, issuance of fresh notice to e. It appears that due to pendency of s Court for a period of around 17 n pursuing the same, as no attempt ounsel. It is, therefore, clear that the pursuing the present matter. instant regular second appeal is any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No le le ith ed ce to y of 17 mpt t the l is RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 19:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.