105 IN TH Punjab Urba Sher Singh CORAM: Present: HARKESH submits tha dated 05.11 of which wa Gurdial Ch instance of maintaining Reference C [2] [3] Chand’s ca Court agree [4] same terms [5] disposed off
May 04, 20 ‘dk kamra’

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR RFA No Date of b Urban Development Authority Versus ingh and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HAR Mr. Maninder Singh Garcha, S Ms. Mehak Kanwar, Advocate for the appellant-PUDA/GMAD None for respondent No. 1-lan Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Additional A for proforma respondent No. 2 **** KESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned Senior ts that the present appeal is squarel 05.11.2009 passed by this Court in a ch was RFA No. 2378 of 2000, titled l Chand and others”, whereby th ce of landowners as well as by the S ining the determination of the ma nce Court. No one appears on behalf of re After going through the jud s case (supra) as well as the fact agrees with the assertion of the learne Consequently, the present a terms as Gurdial Chand’s case (supr Pending miscellaneous applica ed off. , 2026        UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH FA No. 1012 of 2005 (O&M) ate of Decision: 04.05.2026 ...Appellant ...Respondents HARKESH MANUJA ha, Sr. Advocate, assisted by ocate MADA landowner ional Advocate General, Punjab No. 2. enior Counsel for the appellant quarely covered by the judgment t in a bunch of appeals, lead case , titled “State of Punjab Versus by the appeals preferred at the the State were dismissed, while e market value by the learned lf of respondent No. 1-landowner. e judgment passed in Gurdial e facts of the present case, this earned counsel for the appellant. ent appeal is dismissed in the supra). pplication(s), if any, shall stand(s) ( HARKESH MANUJA ) JUDGE
  DINESH KUMAR 2026.05.06 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document