105 IN TH The State o Seo Chand CORAM: Present: HARKESH as GMADA judgment da lead case of Versus Gur the instance maintaining Reference C [2] [3] Chand’s ca Court agre appellant(s)/ [4] same terms [5] disposed off
May 04, 20 ‘dk kamra’

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR RFA No Date of tate of Punjab and another Versus hand and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HAR Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Additional A for the appellants. Mr. Maninder Singh Garcha, S Ms. Mehak Kanwar, Advocate for the PUDA/GMADA None for the respondents-land **** KESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel ADA submit(s) that the present appea dated 05.11.2009 passed by this C ase of which was RFA No. 2378 of 2 Gurdial Chand and others”, where tance of landowners as well as by the ining the determination of the ma nce Court. No one appears on behalf of After going through the jud s case (supra) as well as the fact agrees with the assertion of the (s)/GMADA. Consequently, the present a terms as Gurdial Chand’s case (supr Pending miscellaneous applica ed off. , 2026        UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH FA No. 1874 of 2004 (O&M) ate of Decision: 04.05.2026 ...Appellants ...Respondents HARKESH MANUJA ional Advocate General, Punjab ha, Sr. Advocate, assisted by ocate landowners. unsel(s) for the appellant as well appeal is squarely covered by the this Court in a bunch of appeals, of 2000, titled “State of Punjab whereby the appeals preferred at y the State were dismissed, while e market value by the learned lf of the respondents-landowners. e judgment passed in Gurdial e facts of the present case, this f the learned counsel for the ent appeal is dismissed in the supra). pplication(s), if any, shall stand(s) ( HARKESH MANUJA ) JUDGE
  DINESH KUMAR 2026.05.06 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document