IN THE HIG 233 Premwati and O Om Parkash and BEFORE: HO Present: - No NIDHI GUPTA 1. Pre dismissal of the Faridabad vide A application und refiling the same 2. The issued in the p following order E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA FA Da and Others Versus sh and Others HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI None. UPTA, J. (ORAL) Present appeal has been filed by th of their claim petition by the learned vide Award dated 06.08.2009. The sa n under Section 151 CPC for cond same. The matter pertains to the year 2 the present case. On the last date order was passed by this Court:- “On 25.11.2019, the fo “A is stated t Las argument On 02.07.202 Ph be called hearing. HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-15879 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision:12.03.2026 .… Appellants .... Respondents IDHI GUPTA by the appellants/claimants against th arned Motor Accident Claims Tribuna The said appeal is accompanied with r condonation of 3165 days’ delay year 2018 and notice has yet not bee t date of hearing i.e. on 02.08.202 the following order passed: “Arguing counsel for the appellan ted to be in personal difficulty. Last opportunity to addre ments is sought. On request, adjourned .2020. Photocopy of the records of this ca alled for before the next date ing. ainst the ribunal, with an elay in ot been 8.2022, ellants ddress to is case ate of RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.13 19:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. FAO-15879 of 2 3. Tod 4. A b exhibited an utte be appreciated t affording oppor hand, the appel clear that neith pursuing the pre dismiss the sam 5. Ord 6. Acc 7. Pen 12.03.2026 amit Wh Wh 79 of 2018 (O&M) Leg also file appellant hearing. The matter has due to the situation c Covid-19. Last opportunit address arguments fa shall be appointed to a List on 16.12.20 Today also none has put in appeara A bare reading of the above facts an utterly casual attitude in their pursu iated that very valuable public time o opportunities to the appellants in the appellants have adopted an utterly c t neither the appellantsnor their co the present matter. Thus, this Court is l e same for non-prosecution. Ordered accordingly. Accordingly, the present appeal is d Pending application(s), if any, shall Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No -2- Legible typed copy of the award b filed by learned counsel for th llants before the next date ing.” has been taken up today after 201 on created because of the Pandem tunity is granted to the appellants ts failing which a legal aid couns to assist the Court. 2.20222.” ppearance on behalf of the appellants. facts shows that the appellants ha pursuit of the present litigation. It is time of the Court has been expended in the interest of justice. On the oth ly casual and careless approach.It counsel areseriously interested urt is left with no other option except eal is dismissed for non-prosecution. , shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHIGUPTA ) JUDGE ard be r the te of 2019 demic nts to ounsel lants. have . It is to nded in he other It is sted in xcept to RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.13 19:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.