Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2009 DAILYLAW 1879 (BOM)

TATA MOTORS LIMITED v. GULAM FARID KHAN AND ANR.

WP/4012/2005 · 2026-08-17

body2009

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Megha 78_WP_1027_2009 WITH WP_4012_2005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1027 OF 2009 Gulam Farid Khan since deceased (1A) Smt. Abeda wd/o Farid Khan and Ors. ...Petitioners V/s. Tata Motors Limited ...Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4012 OF 2005 Tata Motors Limited ...Petitioner. V/s. Gulam Farid Khan since deceased (1A) Smt. Abeda wd/o Farid Khan and Ors. ...Respondents ________________ Mr. S.R. Nargolkar with Mr. S.S. Nargolkar and Mr. Aumkar Joshi for the Petitioners in WP/1027/2009 and for the Respondent in WP/4012/2005. Mr. Samkit Shah i/b. M/s. Mulla and Mulla & CBC for the Petitioner in WP/4012/2005 and for Respondent in WP/1027/2009 ________________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED: 17 AUGUST 2026. P.C.: Writ Petition No.1027 OF 2009 :- 1) The learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that the parties have arrived at amicable resolution of disputes amongst them. Towards full and final settlement, the Respondent has agreed to Page No. 1 of 2 17 August 2026 2026:BHC-AS:34139 Megha 78_WP_1027_2009 WITH WP_4012_2005 pay an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- to the legal heirs of the deceased Petitioner. Accordingly, a Demand Draft of Rs.6,00,000/- drawn in the name of Smt. Abeda Farid Khan is handed over to Mr. Nargolkar, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners. 2) The consent terms are tendered in the Court. The consent terms are signed by Petitioner Nos. 1(A) to 1(C) and by authorised representative of the Respondent. Petitioner No.1(D) has given her consent vide email dated 16 August 2026, which is attached to the consent terms. Signatories to the consent terms are personally present before the Court. They admit their signatures on the consent terms as well as the contents thereof. The consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. Statements made in the consent terms are accepted as undertakings given to the Court. 3) Writ Petition is disposed of in view of the consent terms. Writ Petition No. 4012 OF 2005:- 4) Since Writ Petition No.1027 of 2009 is settled, Mr. Shah, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.4012 of 2005 seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the same. 5) Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No. 2 of 2 17 August 2026 Signed by: Megha S. Parab Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 19/08/2026 10:55:06