1 of 3 925-CA.8411.2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 925 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8411 OF 2009 IN FAST/15800/2009 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION JALNA VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ... Mr. Ruturaj C. Patil, Advocate for Applicant. Mrs. A. S. Mantri, AGP for Respondent-State. ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8413 OF 2009 IN FAST/15800/2009 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION JALNA VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. … Mr. Ruturaj C. Patil, Advocate for Applicant. Mrs. A. S. Mantri, AGP for Respondent-State. AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8412 OF 2009 IN FAST/15800/2009 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION JALNA VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. … Mr. Ruturaj C. Patil, Advocate for Applicant. Mrs. A. S. Mantri, AGP for Respondent-State. … AND FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.15800 OF 2009 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION JALNA VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. … 2026:BHC-AUG:26278 2 of 3 925-CA.8411.2009 CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 2nd JULY, 2026 P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant/State. 2. By this appeal, the Appellant assail the Judgment and award dated 30.12.2002 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Jalna in L.A.R. No.141 of 1996. 3. Both the learned Advocates submit that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed. 6. The Claimant is at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the State/acquiring body before the learned Reference Court, if any. 3 of 3 925-CA.8411.2009 7. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef