DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICER EARLIER DESIGNATED AS MILITARY ESTATE OFFICER v. JAYANT KARNAD And ORS
LPA/205/2009 · 2026-01-15
Arun Kumar Rai, Sujit Narayan Prasad
body2009
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2009 DAILYLAW 1647 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2009 DAILYLAW 1647 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page | 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 205 of 2009 --------- Defence Estate Officer, Bihar & Orissa Circle, Danapur Cantonment, Patna, Bihar
… … Appellant Versus Shobha Karnad and Ors.
… … Respondents ---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ---------- For the Appellant : Ms. Shivani Jaluka, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate
----------- 45/Dated: 22nd January, 2026
1. It is a disposed of letters patent appeal listed on the behest of the motion made by the learned counsel for the appellant on the ground that in the
order/judgment dated 15.01.2026 there is some typographical error so far as it relates to making reference of the designation of the learned counsel for the appellant in the appearance part of the cause title and in paragraph-12 wherein it has been typed as “Mr. Prashant Pallav, DSGI” instead of “Mr. Prashant Pallav, ASGI”.
2. Considering the aforesaid ground, the order dated/judgment dated 15.01.2026 is modified to the extent that in the appearance part of the
learned counsel for the appellant and in paragraph-12, “Mr. Prashant Pallav, DSGI” be replaced by “Mr. Prashant Pallav, ASGI”.
3. Accordingly, the order/judgment dated 15.01.2026 is modified to the extent as indicated hereinabove and the remaining part of the
order/judgment shall remain intact.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.) 22nd January, 2026 Saurabh/-