Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2009 DAILYLAW 1480 (DEL)

SHEKHAR @ HARSH v. STATE ( NCT OF DELHI)

BAIL APPLN./2009/2026 · 2026-05-22

Manoj Jain

Public Interest Litigationbody2009

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

BAIL APPLN. 2009/2026 1 $~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2009/2026 & CRL.M.A. 16577-16578/2026 SHEKHAR @ HARSH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Nautiyal, Advocate versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for State SI Pardeep Kumar, PS Rajouri Garden CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN O R D E R % 22.05.2026 1. Applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 0126/2021, dated 10.02.2021 registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden for commission offences under Section 307/34 IPC. 2. He was, admittedly, arrested in the aforesaid case way back on 10.02.2021 and was released on regular bail on 08.04.2021. He kept on appearing before the learned Trial Court on various dates but on 10.03.2026, he had, allegedly, gone on a pilgrimage and, therefore, could not appear which resulted in issuance of warrants against him. 3. On next fixed date i.e. 20.04.2026, he appeared before the learned Trial Court and prayed for cancellation of warrants but such application was dismissed for the reason that he was not found residing at the address disclosed by him. When, eventually, he prayed for release on bail, his such application was also dismissed by observing that he had earlier furnished false information regarding his residential address. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/05/2026 at 11:17:23 BAIL APPLN. 2009/2026 2 4. Learned counsel for applicant submits that there is no intention to mislead and misrepresent the Court and he would have no objection if the residential address is verified by the learned Trial Court, before accepting his bonds. 5. Keeping in mind the overall facts and circumstances of the case, applicant is admitted to bail on his furnishing personal bond and surety bond in a sum of Rs. 20,000/- each. 6. Surety would be local. 7. Learned Trial Court would be at liberty to verify the addresses of accused and the proposed surety bond, before accepting the bonds. 8. Bail application stands disposed of accordingly. 9. Other pending applications also stand disposed of in aforesaid terms. MANOJ JAIN, J MAY 22, 2026/dr/sk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/05/2026 at 11:17:23 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/05/2026 at 11:17:23