Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2009 DAILYLAW 1390 (HP)

RAMESH CHAND v. RAM KRISHAN

CMP.M/737/2026 · 2026-05-19

Rakesh Kainthla

body2009

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Hem Chand & Others vs. Raj Kishan & Ors. RSA No. 180 of 2009 19.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. CMP(M) No. 737 of 2026 Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that there is no objection in case the application is allowed. In view of the fact that no other legal representative is shown to be alive and the right to sue has survived, the present application is allowed and the legal representatives mentioned in para 3 of the application are brought on record. Necessary amended memo be brought on record. Let the amended memo of parties be filed within a week and the matter be listed for hearing in due course. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 19th May, 2026 (Nikita)