Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2009 DAILYLAW 1382 (HP)

B.R.BHATIA v. AMARJIT SINGH

CR.A/368/2009 · 2026-04-01

Rakesh Kainthla

body2009

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

B.R.Bhatia vs. Amarjit Singh Cr.Appeal No. 368 of 2009 01.04.2026. Present: Appellant is present in person with Mr. Abhishek Thakur, Advocate. M/s Mohinder Verma and Digvijay Singh, Advocates, for the respondent. Today statement of the complainant has been recorded in which he stated that he has received full and final payment from the respondent and nothing is due from him, hence, he does not want to proceed further with the complaint filed by him. The Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court held in Chune Ram vs. Brikam Chand 2025:HHC:38122, that Court can quash the conviction even if it was confirmed by the Court, therefore, the conviction recorded case title B.R. Bhatia vs. Amarjit Singh, Cr. Appeal No. 368 of 2009, decided on 21.10.2024 by this Court in in the appellate jurisdiction can also be quashed as per judgment of Hon’ble Division Bench. Today, learned counsel for the respondent has placed on record a receipt dated 04.04.2025, issued by the Member Secretary, H.P. Legal Services Authority, Kasumpti, Shimla, regarding the deposit of ₹10,500/- which is the 15% of the cheque amount. In view of the statement made by the appellant/complainant, the conviction recorded by this Court vide judgment dated 21.10.2024 is ordered to be quashed and the complaint under Section 138 of N.I.Act filed before the learned Trial Court is dismissed as not pressed as the appellant has received full and final payment from the respondent and nothing is due from him. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that no other amount is deposited before any of the Court, hence, no order is required to be passed regarding release of the amount. Present appeal stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 1st April, 2026 (ravinder)