-1- CRL.R.C. No.1015 OF 2009 APHC010048902009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1015/2009 Between: 1. SHAIK BASHA, S/O LATE ALLABAKSH, FOUNDRY WORK R/O NEAR JANADCHETTU, BARAMPET, NARASARAOPET, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto set-aside the Judgment dated 01.06.09 in Crl.A.No.290 of 2008 on the file of the X Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge (FTC), Guntur at Narasaraopet, passed confirming the Judgment dated 08.09.08 in S.C.No.126 of 2008 on the file of the Prl. Asst. Sessions Judge, Narasaraopet. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLRCMP 1364 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy of the Judgment dated 08.09.08 in S.C.No.126 of 2008 on the file of the Prl. Asst. Sessions Judge, Narasaraopet. IA NO: 2 OF 2009(CRLRCMP 1387 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to -2- CRL.R.C. No.1015 OF 2009 suspend the setence dated 1-6-2009 in CrlA.No.290 of 2008 passed by the X.Addl District & Sessions Judge (FTC) Guntur, at narasaraopet, by releasing the peittionr on bail, penidng disposal of the revision case andto pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. UMASANKAR LOKANADHAM Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: -3- CRL.R.C. No.1015 OF 2009 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1015 OF 2009 ORDER: 1. In spite of the matter is being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, none appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The instant criminal revision case has been preferredagainst the judgment dated 08.09.2008, passed by the learned Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Narasaraopet, in S.C.No.126 of 2008 for the offence punishable under Sections 506, 509, 452, 326 & 307 of IPC, wherein the petitioner was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three (03) years and also to pay of fine of Rs.2,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of sixty (60) days, which was confirmed by learned X Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Narasaraopet, in Crl.A.No.290 of 2008. 3. I have perused the order passed by the learned trial court as well as learned Appellate Court. 4. The instant revision case was admitted on 29.06.2009. It appears from the earlier proceeding sheets, since filing of the revision case, the accused/petitioner did not turn up to prosecute the case and the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 5. I have carefully examined the order impugned in the revision. 6. On careful observation of the findings, it appears that learned trial Court has specifically decided the grounds of the revision case as mentioned -4- CRL.R.C. No.1015 OF 2009 by the petitioner, also decided on the point for determination. The order of conviction and sentence has also mentioned the evidentiary value of the witnesses in detail and the documents placed by the parties has also been scanned. I find no illegality and impropriety in the order itself. 7. In view of the fact that the petitioner has shown no inclination to prosecute the matter further and finding no illegality or impropriety in the order of the trial Court, the instant Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as devoid of merit. 8. Under the above observation, the instant criminal revision case is dismissed as devoid of merit. Since the petitioner is not present before this Court, let a copy of this order be served upon learned trial Court, for ready reference. 9. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J Date: 05.08.2026 CVD