Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2009 DAILYLAW 1005 (AP)

SHAIK ABDUL MUNAF AND 3 OTHERS v. SHAIK KHATUNBI AND 2 OTHERS

FCA/157/2009 · 2026-06-17

Balaji Medamalli, D Ramesh

body2009

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010054762009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 157/2009 Between: 1. SHAIK ABDUL MUNAF AND 3 OTHERS, S/O LATESHAIK BUDE SAHEB DRIVER C/O GORIJARINA R/O 8TH LANE, ANANDAPET, 2. SHAIK AKBAR BASHA, S/O LATE SHAIK BUDE SAHEB MILK BUSINESS R/O D.NO. 22 [P] , 3. SHAIK GOUSE, S/O LATE SHAIK BUDE SAHEB PVT. EMPLOYEE C/O LAHI, ITIKIMAPADU RAOD, IDGAMAZID , 2ND LANE, 4. SHAIK KHASIM HUSSAIN, S/O LATE SHAIK BUDE SAHEB RTC CONDUCTOR R/O D.NO. 22 CHIRALA [P] , 1. SHAIK KHATUNBI AND 2 OTHERS, W/O LATE SHAIK BUDE SAHEB HOUSE WIFE R/O 1STLANE, HUSSAIN NAGAR, PONNUR ROAD, 2. SHAIK FAIJUNNISA, W/O MD. SHAUKAT ALI HOUSE WIFE R/O 1ST LANE, HUSSAIN NAGAR, PONNUR ROAD, 3. SHAIK MAIMUNNISA, C/O DRIVER SUBHANI R/O SONY ELECTRONICS, NEAR ROUF MAZID, PONNUR TOWN, GUNTUR D PRESENTLY R/O SANKARA MATAM, RAMASUBBAIAH VEEDHI, RING IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 157/2009 SHAIK ABDUL MUNAF AND 3 OTHERS, S/O LATESHAIK BUDE SAHEB DRIVER C/O GORIJARINA R/O 8TH LANE, ANANDAPET, SHAIK AKBAR BASHA, S/O LATE SHAIK BUDE SAHEB MILK BUSINESS R/O D.NO. 22-12-52, NEAR GOVT. HOSPITAL, CHIRALA SHAIK GOUSE, S/O LATE SHAIK BUDE SAHEB PVT. EMPLOYEE C/O LAHI, ITIKIMAPADU RAOD, IDGAMAZID , 2ND LANE, SHAIK KHASIM HUSSAIN, S/O LATE SHAIK BUDE SAHEB RTC CONDUCTOR R/O D.NO. 22-15-52, NEAR GOVT. HOSPITAL, ...APPELLANT(S) AND SHAIK KHATUNBI AND 2 OTHERS, W/O LATE SHAIK BUDE SAHEB HOUSE WIFE R/O 1STLANE, HUSSAIN NAGAR, PONNUR ROAD, SHAIK FAIJUNNISA, W/O MD. SHAUKAT ALI HOUSE WIFE R/O 1ST LANE, HUSSAIN NAGAR, PONNUR ROAD, SHAIK MAIMUNNISA, W/O LATE ABDUL RASHEED HOUSE WIFE C/O DRIVER SUBHANI R/O SONY ELECTRONICS, NEAR ROUF MAZID, PONNUR TOWN, GUNTUR D PRESENTLY R/O SANKARA MATAM, RAMASUBBAIAH VEEDHI, RING IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3587] EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 157/2009 SHAIK ABDUL MUNAF AND 3 OTHERS, S/O LATESHAIK BUDE SAHEB DRIVER C/O GORIJARINA R/O 8TH LANE, ANANDAPET, SHAIK AKBAR BASHA, S/O LATE SHAIK BUDE SAHEB MILK GOVT. HOSPITAL, CHIRALA SHAIK GOUSE, S/O LATE SHAIK BUDE SAHEB PVT. EMPLOYEE C/O LAHI, ITIKIMAPADU RAOD, IDGAMAZID , 2ND LANE, SHAIK KHASIM HUSSAIN, S/O LATE SHAIK BUDE SAHEB RTC 52, NEAR GOVT. HOSPITAL, ...APPELLANT(S) SHAIK KHATUNBI AND 2 OTHERS, W/O LATE SHAIK BUDE SAHEB HOUSE WIFE R/O 1STLANE, HUSSAIN NAGAR, PONNUR ROAD, SHAIK FAIJUNNISA, W/O MD. SHAUKAT ALI HOUSE WIFE R/O 1ST W/O LATE ABDUL RASHEED HOUSE WIFE C/O DRIVER SUBHANI R/O SONY ELECTRONICS, NEAR ROUF MAZID, PONNUR TOWN, GUNTUR D PRESENTLY R/O SANKARA ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2009(FCAMP 308 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the Order made in MC.No.229 of 2008 dated 12-2- 2009 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Guntur pending disposal of this appeal Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. A VARALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 157/2009 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D Ramesh) 1. Aggrieved by the order dated 12.02.2009 passed in M.C.No.229 of 2008 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Guntur, granting maintenance to the respondent No.1, the appellants 1 to 4 have preferred the present appeal. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants, on instructions, submits that respondent No.1 i.e., petitioner in M.C.No.229 of 2008 has expired. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication in the appeal. 3. Recording the said submission, the present Family Court Appeal is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH __________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 18.06.2026 SAK 78 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 157/2009 Date: 18.06.2026 SAK