Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 39
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: SWP No. 335/2008
Balibhadar Singh …. Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through:- None
V/s
Union of India & Ors. …..Respondent(s) Through:- None
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
23.07.2026
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 12.09.2023, 17.10.2023 and thereafter, the matter was listed on 21.11.2023, however, due to paucity of time the matter was adjourned on
08.05.2025. Today when the matter was taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioners is not interested in prosecuting the instant petition. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
2. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE JAMMU 23.07.2026 Suraj K. Singh