Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2008 DAILYLAW 4853 (MAD)

Rail Vikas Nigam Ltd., v. C.SHANMUGA SUNDARAM

WMP(MD)/15895/2025 · 2026-06-12

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2008

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SA(MD) No.936 of 2008 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated 12.06.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH WMP(MD) NO. 15895 of 2025 1. Rail Vikas Nigam Ltd., (A Govt. Of India Enterprises) Aringar Anna Maligai Mezzanine Floor Thirumayillai Railway Station Mylapore Chennai. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. C.Shanmuga Sundaram S/o.Chinnaiah 113a Trichy Road Manaparai-621 306 Trichy District. 2. The District Revenue Officer (Regular) Trichirapalli. 3. The Divisional Manager Southern Railway Madurai. 4. The Special Tahsildar 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA(MD) No.936 of 2008 Double of Broad Gauge Villupuram to Dindigul Collectorate Trichirapalli. 5. The Divisional Manager Southern Railway Trichy Division. Respondent(s) Prayer: To pass an order to modify the order made in W.P. (MD).No. 14533/2019 dated 26.04.2021. For Appellant(s): M/s A.Haja Mohideen For Defendant(s): Mr. G.Prabhu Rajadurai for R1 ORDER Heard both sides. 2. Considering the fact that the appeal filed by the Railways is pending in WA(MD) No.838 of 2024 before the Division Bench, the grievance that has now been raised in this petition can as well be raised 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA(MD) No.936 of 2008 before the Division Bench since the petitioner is a party in the writ appeal. It is not necessary for this Court to independently consider the same in this petition. Hence, by granting the above liberty, this petition is closed and when such a ground is raised, it is always left open to the respondent in this petition to raise their objection. (N.ANAND VENKATESH J.) 12-06-2026 RR 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis