HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 65972 of 2008 Court No. - 34 Sl.No. 35 HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. List revised. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the instant petition even in the revised call. 2. The instant petition has been filed seeking the following prayer: "i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus restraining the respondents to retire the petitioner at the age of 58 years. ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay salary of the petitioner alongwith allowances and other benefits of service treating the age of retirement of the petitioner to 60 years." 3. From perusal of the aforesaid prayer as well as the record, it appears that the instant petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. May 7, 2026 o.k. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Pandey, Sudhir Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.K. Srivastava, C.S.C. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) Deep Chand Singh .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- OM KRISHNA CHOUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad