HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 60727 of 2008 Court No. - 34 Sl. No. 35 HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. List revised. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the instant petition even in the revised call. 2. The instant petition has been filed seeking the following prayer: "i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondents to retire the petitioner at the age of 58 years; ii. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay salary of the petitioner along with allowances and other benefits of service treating the age of retirement of the petitioner to 60 years; iii. ...... iv. ........ v. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 31.12.2008 (Annexure 2 to the supplementary affidavit) and portion of resolution no. 8 dated 6.5.2006 (Annexure 2 to the writ petition) wherein policy decision to enhance the age of superannuation have been referred for approval by the State Government (amended prayer)" Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Pande, Sudhir Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.K. Srivastava, C.S.C. Yogesh Chandra Bajpai .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) 3. From perusal of the aforesaid prayer as well as the record, it appears that the instant petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. May 7, 2026 o.k. WRIA No. 60727 of 2008 2 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- OM KRISHNA CHOUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad