IN TH 121 Chanan Si State of Ha CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU appropriate Certiorari, passed by were termin which con Court vide Criminal department of 2008 vid observed th binding up CWP-23645-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR CWP No.23645 o Date of decision nan Singh Versus of Haryana and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Kuldeep Sheoran, Advoca for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. A HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petitio opriate writ, order or direction, par orari, for quashing the order dated 0 ed by respondent No.4, whereby the terminated solely on account of his co h conviction has subsequently been t vide judgment dated 17.09.2025 ( inal Revision No.529 of 2010. I rtmental appellate authority, while dec 08 vide order dated 02.04.2009 (Anne rved that the final decision in the crim ing upon both the parties. Despit 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 3645 of 2026 (O & M) cision :-13.08.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA dvocate ddl. A.G., Haryana. petition is for issuance of an n, particularly in the nature of ated 07.07.2008 (Annexure P-1) by the services of the petitioner his conviction in a criminal case, been set aside by this Hon’ble 2025 (Annexure P-3) passed in 010. It is submitted that the ile deciding Service Appeal No.9 (Annexure P-2), had specifically e criminal proceedings would be Despite the conviction having VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.14 20.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document subsequent attained fin judgment, arbitrary an order or di the respond service an superannua date of his consequent arrears of encashmen benefits, a particularly (Annexure in the offic reliefs, but by the resp that the pe issued to re Notice dat pending co CWP-23645-2026 (O & M) equently been set aside and the acquit ed finality, the respondents have faile ment, thereby rendering the impugned rary and unsustainable in law; for issua r or direction, particularly in the natu espondents to reinstate the petitioner in ce and, since the petitioner has alr rannuation, to treat him as having co of his superannuation and thereafte equential service, retiral and pensi rs of pay and allowances, annual i shment, pension, family pension a fits, along with applicable interest, cularly in view of the legal notice da exure P-4), which was also duly serve e office of respondent No.3 on 18.02.2 fs, but the same has neither been duly e respondents till date. At the outset, learned counsel petitioner would be satisfied, at t d to respondent No.3 to consider and ce dated 10.10.2025 (Annexure P ing consideration. Notice of motion. 2 acquittal of the petitioner having e failed to give effect to the said pugned termination order illegal, r issuance of an appropriate writ, e nature of Mandamus, directing oner in service with continuity of as already attained the age of ing continued in service till the ereafter to grant and release all pensionary benefits, including nual increments, gratuity, leave sion and all other admissible terest, in accordance with law, tice dated 10.10.2025/12.02.2026 served by hand by the petitioner 18.02.2026, seeking the aforesaid n duly considered nor acted upon ounsel for the petitioner submits d, at this stage, if a direction is er and decide the aforesaid Legal re P-4), which is stated to be VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.14 20.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document notice and counsel for claim raise the present No.3 to co (Annexure accordance receipt of a opinion on the compe accordance of. August 13 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo CWP-23645-2026 (O & M) Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Add e and has no objection in case the limi sel for the petitioner is accepted. Without expressing any opin raised by the petitioner, and in view resent writ petition is disposed of wit to consider and decide the Legal exure P-4) by passing a speaking rdance with law, within a period of pt of a certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Co ion on the entitlement of the petitioner competent authority shall take an rdance with the applicable rules and re Pending application(s), if any 3, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 , Addl. A.G., Haryana accepts e limited prayer made by learned y opinion on the merits of the view of the limited relief sought, of with a direction to respondent Legal Notice dated 10.10.2025 eaking and reasoned order, in d of 06 months from the date of is Court has not expressed any itioner to the claimed benefit, and e an independent decision in and regulations. if any, shall also stand disposed ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.14 20.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document