MANTOSH BHATACHARYA AND ANR. v. H.P.G.C.L. AND ORS.
CWP/19331/2008 · 2026-07-15
Aman Chaudhary
body2008
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2008 DAILYLAW 2361 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2008 DAILYLAW 2361 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 623
CWP-19331-2008 (O&M)
Date of decision: 15.07.2026 MANTOSH BHATACHARYA AND ANR.
... Petitioners
Versus H.P.G.C.L. AND ORS.
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : Mr. Neeraj Tyagi, Advocate for
Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. AG, Haryana.
**** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
1.
Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the order dated 04.02.2004 whereby respondents have been assigned deemed date of promotion, might not be surviving due to efflux of time especially in wake of there being no interim order.
2.
Learned State counsel, on the other hand, submits that petitioners were not promoted along with the others on account of they having not passed the type test, however, having been done so on 22.08.2005, they were accordingly promoted.
3.
Disposed of, reserving the petitioners with a liberty to get it revived by demonstrating that cause of action still subsists.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) 15.07.2026
JUDGE ashok
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.07.15 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document