Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2008 DAILYLAW 2359 (PNJ)

VIJAY KUMAR & ORS. v. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

CWP/19313/2008 · 2026-07-15

Aman Chaudhary

body2008

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & 622 VIJAY KUMAR & ORS. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. list dated 16.10.2008, Annexure P had been deputed for the intermediate school course, might not be surviving due to efflux of time. 2. revived by demonstrating that the cause of action still subsists. 15.07.2026 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether repor IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & CHANDIGARH CWP Date of decision VIJAY KUMAR & ORS. Versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Aditya Yadav, Advocate and Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A. G. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the selection list dated 16.10.2008, Annexure P-4, vide which respondents No.5 to 13 had been deputed for the intermediate school course, might not be surviving due to efflux of time. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner revived by demonstrating that the cause of action still subsists. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19313-2008 (O & M) Date of decision: 15.07.2026 ....Petitioners ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Aditya Yadav, Advocate and Advocate, Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A. G. Haryana. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the selection 4, vide which respondents No.5 to 13 had been deputed for the intermediate school course, might not be ving the petitioners with a liberty to get it revived by demonstrating that the cause of action still subsists. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.07.15 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.