RSA-2008- IN THE HIG 289 Punjab State Sanjeev Kum CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. judgment of District Judg was allowed passed by th injunction an 2. submits that whether juris the Electricit Bench of th Sub Division -2025 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o State Power Corporation Ltd. Versus v Kumar and another M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Divanshu Jain and Mr. Abh for the appellant(s). Mr. Vikas Malik, Advocate for Mr. BK Saini, Advocate for the I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant-defendant(s) are ent of reversal dated 27.01.2025 pass t Judge, Moga whereby the appeal file llowed, setting aside the judgment a by the learned trial Court; and sui tion and consequential relief of perman At the very outset, learned that the question of law involved er jurisdiction of the Civil Court is bar ectricity Act, 2003, has since been dec of this Court in RSA-4181-2016, ti ivisional Officer and Another’ vide j ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2008-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.02.2026 .… Appellant(s) .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA r. Abhinav Goel, Advocates te for for the respondents. are in second appeal against the passed by the learned Additional eal filed by the plaintiff/respondents ment and decree dated 01.09.2018 nd suit for declaration, mandatory permanent injunction was allowed. rned counsel for the appellant(s) volved in the present appeal as to t is barred in view of Section 145 of en decided by the Hon’ble Division , titled as ‘Mahesh Kumar vs. vide judgment dated 14.05.2025. the onal tory s to 5 of sion vs. RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.18 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-2008- 3. and the suit ground of ju take recours law. 4. made in the judicata in plaintiffs. 5. 17.02.2026 rishu -2025 (O&M) -2- In view of the above, the prese e suit filed by the respondent-plaint d of jurisdiction. However, the respond ecourse to the appropriate remedy as It is made clear that any ev in the impugned judgments and decr in any subsequent proceedings Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable e present second appeal is allowed, plaintiffs stands dismissed on the espondent-plaintiffs are at liberty to dy as available, in accordance with ny evidence recorded/observations d decrees would not operate as res ings initiated by the respondent- any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No the ty to with ions es RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.18 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.