Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2008 DAILYLAW 1849 (BOM)

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. v. NAINA RAJEN SANGHAVI AND OTHRS

FA/598/2008 · 2026-08-25

body2008

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

20 Fa-598-2008.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 598 OF 2008 New India Assurance Co. Ltd ...Appellant Vs. Naina Rajen Sanghavi And Others ...Respondents ***** Mr. Sandeep S. Jinsiwale Advocate for the Appellant Mr. T. J. Mendon Advocate for the Respondent No. 1 ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 25th AUGUST 2026 P. C. :- 1. On the basis of the instructions received from the Appellant- Insurance Company, learned Advocate for the Appellant submitted that they want to withdraw the appeal. 2. Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. 3. Statutory deposit alongwith interest be transferred to the Tribunal. 4. Refund the Court fees as per the Rules. Seema 1/2 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Digitally signed by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date: 2026.08.27 13:07:55 +0530 20 Fa-598-2008.doc 5. Appellant is at liberty to withdraw the remaining amount alongwith interest, if they have not already withdrawn. 6. Record and proceedings be transferred on a priority basis in any eventuality, within a period of four weeks from today. The Registrar (Judicial-I) to look into this aspect. [S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 2/2