$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 329/2008 VIJAY KUMAR SINGH CHAUDHARY .....Appellant Through: None versus STATE & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Panel Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Siddharth Arora, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R % 13.05.2026 1. On 08.01.2026, noticing the absence of parties as well as their counsels, Court Notices were directed to be issued to thelearned counselsappearing for the parties. On the next date of hearing, i.e., 24.02.2026, it was noted that as per the office report, that the Notice issued to the learned counsel for the appellant was dulyserved,however, the notice issued to respondent nos. 2 and 3, remained unserved,as their counsel had reported that he no longerhad instructions to appear in the matter. 2. In aforesaid backdrop, fresh Court Notice was directed to be issued to the parties as well as to their counsels. As per the office report, Notice issued to the appellant remained unserved with the report that the appellant hadleft away/sold awaythe given address, however learned counsel for the appellant was again shown to be served. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2026 at 11:52:40 3. In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed in default for non-prosecution. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MAY 13, 2026 sn This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2026 at 11:52:40