APHC010381862008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 22 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No: 5997 of 2008 Between: 1. SATTI PADMAVATHI, W/o. SATTI VENKATA MOHANA HANUMAN REDDY, KOMMARA VILLAGE, ATHILI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 1. GRAMA SECRETARIAT ATHILI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL KOVVUR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, ATHILI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Mr.S.APPADHARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. Mr.A S C BOSE 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No: 5997 of 2008 PADMAVATHI, W/o. SATTI VENKATA MOHANA HANUMAN REDDY, KOMMARA VILLAGE, ATHILI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI ...PETITIONER AND GRAMA SECRETARIAT, KOMMARA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, ATHILI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, LAND ACQUISITIN OFFICER, KOVVUR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ATHILI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.S.APPADHARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3209] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA PADMAVATHI, W/o. SATTI VENKATA MOHANA HANUMAN REDDY, KOMMARA VILLAGE, ATHILI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI ...PETITIONER KOMMARA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICER, LAND ACQUISITIN OFFICER, ATHILI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite his efforts, he could not secure instructions in the matter. On the other hand, Ms.Vijayeswari, learned Assistant Government Pleader placed a copy of latest instructions dated 22.07.2026 received from the 3rd respondent for perusal of the Court. As seen from the said instructions and the letter enclosed to it, it appears that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the writ petition and the letter in this regard was addressed to 1st respondent on 11.10.2022. Obviously that might be the reason for the petitioner not responding to the learned counsel for the petitioner. Be that as it may. Placing instructions and the letter annexed to it on record, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date: 22.07.2026 BLV 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA W.P.No.5997 of 2008 Dt: 22.07.2026 BLV