APHC010055932008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1536/2008 Between: 1. BADAVETI NAGA LAKSHMI DEVI,, W/O KRISHNA MURTHY, R/O D.NO. 12-19-77, NEAR SAYAMMA HIGH SCHOOL, OLD CLUB ROAD, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP REP BY ITS PP HYD ANOTHER, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AT HYDERABAD. 2. TANNERU RAVI KUMAR, S/O SAMBASIVA RAO, R/O SRINIVASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this Memorandum of Crl.R.C., against the Judgment dt. 16-10-2008 in Crl.A.No. 42 of 2008, on the file of the Spl.Sessions Judge,-cum- IV Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, Guntur which was ordered in confirming the conviction and sentence of imprisonment made in Judgment in CC.No. 302 of 2007, dt. 13- 02-2008 on the file of the Court of the V Addl. Munsiff Magistrate, Guntur District. IA NO: 1 OF 2008(CRLRCMP 2107 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the sentence and release the petitioner on bail pending disposal of 2 the Crl.P., preferred against the Judgment in Crl.A.No. 42 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the IV Addl. Sessions Judge, Guntur, filed against the Judgment in CC.No. V Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, in CC.No. 302 of 2007. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V LAKSHMI NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1536/2008 ORDER: Report of District Legal Services Authority, Guntur District reflects that the petitioner has expired on 13.06.2016. The instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred against the order of conviction passed by learned Magistrate concerned against the present petitioner for the offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Since the petitioner has expired, nothing is left for this Court to pass any order. Accordingly, the instant Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as abated. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated:15.06.2026. SSA