1 OD – 6 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Customs] ORIGINAL SIDE ITA/406/2008 M/S. GRAHITE INDIA LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – IV BEFORE : THE HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR Date : 5th May, 2026 Appearance : Mr. Somak Basu, Adv. Mr. Swagato Kabiraj, Adv. ….for appellant. Mr. Wahed Reja, Adv. …for respondent. The Court : The Court: Learned counsel appearing for the appellant refers to the substantial question of law that was admitted on 06.08.2008 by an order passed by their Lordships Hon’ble Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose and Hon’ble Justice Sankar Prasad Mitra. The substantial question of law is as follows: “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in holding that deduction allowed u/s. 80IA of the Act needs to be reduced while computing Profits of the Business eligible for deduction u/s. 80HHC of the Act?” 2 Learned counsel Mr. Basu submits that the issue is already covered by the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Shital Fibers Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, reported in [2025] 476 ITR 309 (SC). Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/department on instruction agrees with the submission made by the appellant. As such, in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Shital Fibers Ltd. (Supra), this Court holds the substantial question of law to be in negative and in favour of the assessee. The appeal being ITA No. 406 of 2008 is disposed of. (RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.) (UDAY KUMAR, J.) sd/