S. A(MD)No.184 of 2007 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated 27.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH CMP(MD) NO. 3594 of 2026 IN REV.APLC(MD) SR NO. 18268 OF 2026 Swaminathan S/o. Adaikkan Seviyarkudikadu Aathankaraipatty Post Kottai Theru Via Gandarvakottai Taluk Pudukkottai District. Petitioner(s)/ review applicant Vs 1. Ramasamy Sanaiar S/o. Chinnian Seviyarkudikadu Athankaraipatty Post Gandarvakkottai Taluk Pudukkottai District. 2. Rajalingam S/o. Ramasamy Seviyarkudikadu Athankaraipatty Post Gandarvakkottai Taluk Pudukkottai District. 3. Ganesan S/o. Thavasi Seviyarkudikadu Athankaraipatty Post 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S. A(MD)No.184 of 2007 Gandarvakkottai Taluk Pudukkottai District. 4. Rengasamy S/o. Adiakkan Seviyarkudikadu Athankaraipatty Post Gandarvakkottai Taluk Pudukkottai District. 5. Thangaraju S/o. Mari Seviyarkudikadu Athankaraipatty Post Gandarvakkottai Taluk Pudukkottai District. Respondent(s)/respondents Prayer:To condone the delay of 1,117 days to file the Review Application against the order of S.A.(MD) No. 459 of 2008 dated 06.01.2023. Prayer in Rev.Aplc(MD) No.SR18268/2026: Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 r/w 114 of C.P.C. to review the judgment passed in SA(MD) No.459/2008 dated 06.01.2023. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Balamurugan For Respondent(s): No appearance ORDER This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 1117 days in filing the review application against the order passed in SA No.459/2008 dated 06.01.2023. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/review applicant. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S. A(MD)No.184 of 2007 3. In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, there is absolutely no reason assigned except stating that the petitioner was affected by COVID-10 virus and thereafter he was affected by Jaundice. None of the submission made in the affidavit is supported by any materials. There is exorbitant delay in filing the review application. This Court is not satisfied with the reasons assigned in the condone delay petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Accordingly, the Review Application stands rejected at the SR stage itself. No costs. 27.03.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No RR 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S. A(MD)No.184 of 2007 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J RR Order made in CMP(MD) NO. 3594 of 2026 IN REV.APLC(MD) SR NO. 18268 OF 2026 27.03.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis