HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 33136 of 2007 Court No. - 34 (Sl. No. 26) HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. List revised. None appears for the petitioner to press the instant petition. Sri Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. Vide order dated 24.7.2007, this Court has called for the counter affidavit to apprise the Court as to what action has been taken after the three charge-sheets were issued to the petitioner. Counter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit have been exchanged between the parties. At the time of filing of the rejoinder affidavit, which was filed on 20.8.2008, age of the petitioner was 54 years. Thus, as of now the petitioner might have attained the age of superannuation long back. As such, the instant petition has become infructuous due to passage of time. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as infructuous. May 7, 2026 n.u. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : A.S. Diwekar, Meraj Uddin Counsel for Respondent(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, Govind Saran, Kaushif Zaidi, SC, Vivek Singh (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) Satish Kumar Bhatnagar .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NASEEM UDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad