(O&M) NARINDER PARKASH MEHTA v. SUDESH GOGNA AND ORS.
CR/1092/2007 · 2026-08-18
Deepak Gupta
body2007
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2007 DAILYLAW 2366 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2007 DAILYLAW 2366 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 111 CR-1092-2007 Date of decision: 18.08.2026
Pushpa Rani and others . . . . Petitioners Vs. Smt. Sudesh Gogna and others
. . . . Respondents ****
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
**** Present: - Mr.Shelly K. Singla, Advocate, for the petitioners.
None for the respondents.
**** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions from his client, submits that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and therefore, this petition is rendered infructuous.
2.
In view of the aforesaid statement, present petition stands
disposed of having been rendered infructuous.
(DEEPAK GUPTA) 18.08.2026 JUDGE
Whether Speaking/reasoned
Yes Whether reportable
No
VIVEK PAHWA 2026.08.18 14:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document