CRR-13-2007 (O&M) 1 251/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-13-2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 RAVINDER SINGH ... PETITIONER VERSUS GURJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER ... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present- Mr. Anmol Jeevan Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anmoldeep Singh, Advocate with Mr. Utsav Singh Bains, Advocate for the respodents. H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Present revision has been filed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30.10.2006 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Amritsar whereby the respodents were convicted and sentenced to undergo as under:- I) Gurjit Singh Charge: Under Sections 307, 326, 324, 325, 323, 34 IPC Sentence: To undergo rigorous imprisonment as under: (a) To undergo RI for a period of 10 years and fine of Rs.5000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year under Section 307 IPC. (b) To undergo RI for a period of 04 years and fine of Rs.3000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for period of nine months under Section 326 IPC. (c) To undergo RI for a period of 01 year and fine of Rs.500/-, in default JANKI BHATT 2026.07.17 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRR-13-2007 (O&M) 2 of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 01 month under Section 324 IPC. (d) To undergo RI for a period of 02 years and fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for period of 03 months under Section 325/34 IPC. (e) To undergo RI for a period of 04 months and fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for period of one month under Section 323/34 IPC. All the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently. II) Gurlal Singh Charge: Under Sections 307, 326, 324, 325, 323, 34 IPC Sentence: To undergo rigorous imprisonment as under: (a) To undergo RI for a period of 09 years and fine of Rs.4000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of nine months under Section 307/34 IPC. (b) To undergo RI for a period of 03 years and fine of Rs.2000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for period of 06 months under Section 326/34 IPC. (c) To undergo RI for a period of 09 months and fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 01 month under Section 324/34 IPC. (d) To undergo RI for a period of 03 years and fine of Rs.3000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for period of 09 months under Section 325/34 IPC. (e) To undergo RI for a period of 06 months and fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for period of one month under Section 323/34 IPC. All the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently. 2. The case of the prosecution is that complainant Ravinder Singh, his wife Surinder Kaur and brother Joginder Singh, after attending work in their fields, were going to their house. It was about 5.30 PM when they reached opposite to Shatala field of Gurmej Singh, then accused Gurjit Singh carrying dattar and Gurlal Singh carrying dang came on foot from JANKI BHATT 2026.07.17 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRR-13-2007 (O&M) 3 opposite side and upon finding complainant party, accused Gurlal Singh exhorted that they be caught hold and they be given the taste for having helped uncle Joginder Singh and for having demanded agricultural fields. Gurjit Singh gave five datar blows and Gurlal Singh gave seven dang blows, one after another to complainant. Then, the complainant party raised alarm. Accused fled away from the spot alongwith their weapons of offence. 3. The parties have compromised the matter and their statements have also been recorded before the learned trial Court to that effect. 4. Learned State counsel has filed the custody certificates in the Court, which are taken on record. He further submits that the learned trial Court has passed well reasoned judgment based on correct appreciation of evidence available on record. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the material placed on record. 6. Since the parties have compromised the matter and the FIR in the present case pertains to the year 2005 and the respodents have already faced the rigors of the trial for more than 20 years, no ground is made out for enhancement of sentence to the respondents. 7. Accordingly, the present revision petition stands dismissed. 8. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (H.S.GREWAL) 14.07.2026 JUDGE Janki Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2026.07.17 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh