IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 546 CWP-14961-2007 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.07.2026 Vikram Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pratyush Sood, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned Senior counsel submits that during pendency of the present case, the petitioner has been granted promotion as Wireman vide order dated 31.10.2009, however, not w.e.f. 05.06.2007, which he is entitled to on account of CIDC certificate, which was accepted subsequently due to equivalence, in view of which, he will file a representation giving details of these facts to stake a claim, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner. 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents that in case petitioner submits a representation within a period of 4 weeks, the same shall be considered and decided, within a further period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 13.07.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2026.07.13 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document