345 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3274-2007 (O&M) Date of Decision : 28.01.2026 Smt. Premo alias Premni Devi Dahiya ......Appellant Vs. State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present : Mr. Arvind Bansal, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Ram Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1. The present Regular Second Appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2004 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Kurukshetra, whereby, appeal filed by the respondents against the judgment and decree dated 30.04.2004 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kurukshetra, was allowed. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the present appeal has been rendered infructuous, as the appellant has already retired from service and the issue involved in the present appeal pertains to the change of date of birth. 3. In view of the above, present petition is dismissed as having been rendered as infructuous. 4. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 28.01.2026 Virender Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.01.30 11:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document