( 1 ) THIS application has been made for bail by the accused, who is involved in offence under Section 376/511 IPC. The complainant, aged 15 years, was working as a domestic servant in the house of the accused/petitioner, who is aged around 55 years. Complainant lodged a report that she had come to Delhi about three months ago with her aunt as her financial condition of her family was not good and she got employed as domestic servant at the house of accused at salary of Rs. 800/ per month. She used to stay at the house of the accused itself. On the night intervening 28th / 29th November, 2006, when she was at her room, accused entered in her room, pressed her breast, gaged her mouth, removed her salwar and underwear and established physical relationship with her (Sharirik Samband Banaya Aur Bura Kam Kiya ). At that moment out of fear, she could not do anything. However, on next day, she went to her aunt and reported entire matter to her. When her uncle came back from work he was told of the crime then she was taken to police post, where she lodged a report. Counsel for the accused has stated that MLC does not show any injury on the body of the prosecutrix. Her hymen was intact and the accused was falsely implicated in this case. It is undisputed that the prosecutrix was working as domestic servant in the house of the accused. she was living in the house of the accused. She had come from village only three months back. No reason has been given as to why a minor girl of 15 years would falsely implicate the employer, who had provided her job. No allegations of enmity of any sort have been made. There is no reason before this court to disbelieve the statement of prosecutrix at this stage. Charge has already been framed against the accused and the case has been fixed for prosecution evidence by the trial court. I find no reason to enlarge the accused on bail. The bail application is dismissed.