CWP-7675 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Surjit Kaur State of Punjab and others CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. filing the instant writ petition under Article 226/227 of India, assailing the which, the application Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, However, the respondent Rs.6,000/ 2. the petitioner, on instructions, the amount o 3. that the respondent pay an amount of Rs.8,000/ maintenance till her lifetime. 7675-2023 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Surjit Kaur @ Jasvir Kaur Versus State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Ms. Hardeep Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. Karanjeet Singh Brar, ADVocate, and Mr. Deepak Arya, Advocate, for respondent No.4. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral) The petitioner-senior citizen the instant writ petition under Article 226/227 of India, assailing the order dated 13.09.2022 (Annexure P the order dated 19.07.2022 (Annexure P application preferred by her, under Section 23 of Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, However, the respondent-son was directed to pay an amount of Rs.6,000/- to the petitioner. Having argued the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, confines the the amount of maintenance be adequately enhanced. In response, learned counsel for respondent No.4 that the respondent-son, in order to give quietus to the dispute, is ready to pay an amount of Rs.8,000/- per month to his mother ance till her lifetime. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7675-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.04.2026 ….Petitioner ….Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Ms. Hardeep Kaur, Advocate, Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. Karanjeet Singh Brar, ADVocate, and Mr. Deepak Arya, Advocate, senior citizen has approached this Court, by the instant writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution 13.09.2022 (Annexure P-11), vide order dated 19.07.2022 (Annexure P-9), thereby, allowing the under Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, was set aside. son was directed to pay an amount of Having argued the matter at some length, learned counsel for the prayer only to the extent that f maintenance be adequately enhanced. In response, learned counsel for respondent No.4, submits son, in order to give quietus to the dispute, is ready to per month to his mother-petitioner towards .2026 s approached this Court, by of the Constitution vide thereby, allowing the the Maintenance and set aside. son was directed to pay an amount of Having argued the matter at some length, learned counsel for to the extent that submits son, in order to give quietus to the dispute, is ready to petitioner towards AMIT KUMAR 2026.04.24 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-7675 4. graciously accept 5. parties, this Court Accordingly, respondent No.4 10th day of every month lifetime. senior citizen shall be the instant writ petition. 6. above terms. 23.04.2026 Ak Sharma 7675-2023 (O&M) -2- Learned counsel for the graciously accepted the offer. In view of the abovesaid consensus arrived at between the this Court is not required to delve into the merits of the case. Accordingly, the impugned order is modified to the extent espondent No.4 shall remit an amount of day of every month in the bank account In the event of default in payment of maintenance amount, the senior citizen shall be at liberty to move an apt application for revival of the instant writ petition. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is above terms. .2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable earned counsel for the petitioner-senior citizen has abovesaid consensus arrived at between the delve into the merits of the case. order is modified to the extent that of Rs.8,000/-, as maintenance, by bank account of the petitioner, till her In the event of default in payment of maintenance amount, the at liberty to move an apt application for revival of Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of, in the (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Yes Yes/No has abovesaid consensus arrived at between the delve into the merits of the case. that by her In the event of default in payment of maintenance amount, the at liberty to move an apt application for revival of in the AMIT KUMAR 2026.04.24 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document