ZILLA PARISHAD AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS EX ENG v. THE STATE OF MAH and ANR
CA/10386/2006 · 2026-08-18
body2007
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2007 DAILYLAW 1800 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2007 DAILYLAW 1800 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Dilwale 1 19-FA-432-07.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 19 FIRST APPEAL NO. 432 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10386 OF 2006 Zilla Parishad Aurangabad Through Its Ex Eng VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ... AGP for Respondent-State: Mr. D. R. Korde Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. C. K. Sonawane ...
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10388 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.433 OF 2007 Zilla Parishad Aurangabad VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Ors
WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 433 OF 2007 Zilla Parishad Aurangabad VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Ors CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 18.08.2026 PER COURT :
1. As the acquisition proceeding is of the year 1997, the appeals are being heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for the respective parties. 2026:BHC-AUG:38225
Dilwale 2 19-FA-432-07.odt
2. By these appeals, the appellant assails the Judgment and award dated 24.01.2006 passed by the ad-hoc Additional District Judge, Aurangabad in L.A.R. Nos.92 and 95/2002.
3. Learned AGP submits that the compensation granted by the learned Reference Court is within four times the compensation granted by the SLAO.
4. In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times.
5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned awards. Hence, the present Appeals are dismissed.
6. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly.
[ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE