Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2007 DAILYLAW 1793 (BOM)

NITIN CHHAGAN BHISE v. SANJAY DINKAR RAIPURE

APEAL/541/2007 · 2026-08-25

body2007

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 51.cri.apeal.541.2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 541 OF 2007 Shri Nitin s/o Chhagan Bhise ..vs.. Sanjay s/o Dinkar Raipure - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Appellant in person. CORAM: M.M. NERLIKAR, J. DATE : 25.08.2026. By filing a Pursis across the bar, it is informed by the appellant in person that the matter is settled between the parties amicably and therefore, he does not want to press the appeal. 2. Pursis is taken on record. 3. This appeal is challenging the judgment and orders of acquittal passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Buldhana and Special Court of 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 4. It is not in dispute that the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is compoundable. Be that as it may since the appeal is not pressed, the same is disposed of. (M.M. NERLIKAR , J. ) Trupti Signed by: Trupti D. Agrawal Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 25/08/2026 18:27:31