GODAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LATUR AND ANR v. TULSIRAM BAPURAO JADHAV AND ANR
CA/9023/2007 · 2026-07-02
Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
body2007
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2007 DAILYLAW 1777 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2007 DAILYLAW 1777 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 of 3 922-CA.9022.2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 922 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9022 OF 2007 IN FAST/18603/2007 GODAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LATUR AND ANR VERSUS TULSIRAM BAPURAO JADHAV AND ANR ... Mr. S. G. Sangle, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. A.A.A. Khan, AGP for Respondent-State. ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9024 OF 2007 IN FAST/18603/2007 GODAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LATUR AND ANR VERSUS TULSIRAM BAPURAO JADHAV AND ANR … Mr. S. G. Sangle, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. A.A.A. Khan, AGP for Respondent-State.
AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9023 OF 2007 IN FAST/18603/2007 GODAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LATUR AND ANR VERSUS TULSIRAM BAPURAO JADHAV AND ANR … Mr. S. G. Sangle, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. A.A.A. Khan, AGP for Respondent-State. … AND FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.18603 OF 2007 GODAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LATUR AND ANR Tauseef 2026:BHC-AUG:26268-DB
2 of 3 922-CA.9022.2007 VERSUS TULSIRAM BAPURAO JADHAV AND ANR … CORAM :
SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE :
2nd JULY, 2026 P.C.:-
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellants/State.
2. By this appeal, the Appellants are assailing the Judgment and award dated 05.04.2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Nilanga, District Latur in LAR No.564 of 2002.
3. Both the learned Advocates submit that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer.
4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution
No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4
dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times.
5.
Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed.
6. The Claimant is at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the State/acquiring body before the learned Reference Court, if any. Tauseef
3 of 3 922-CA.9022.2007
7. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly.
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef