THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.333 OF 2007 And TRANSFER APPEAL SUIT No.121 OF 2009 COMMON JUDGMENT:- The learned counsel for the appellant is present, and the learned counsel for the respondents appeared virtually. 2. Today, when the matters are taken up for hearing, it is noticed that, as per the Registry endorsement, the notice sent to the address of the sole appellant, mentioned in the grounds of appeal was returned unserved with the postal endorsement ‘Addressee left’. Therefore, service is held sufficient 3. It seems that the appellant is not inclined to prosecute both the appeals. 4. Considering the aforesaid circumstances, the appeal suit and transfer appeal suit are dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 22.04.2026 JLSR 214 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.333 OF 2007 And TRANSFER APPEAL SUIT No.121 OF 2009 Date: 22.04.2026 JLSR