Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2007 DAILYLAW 1270 (AP)

K.PANDURANGA RAO, ZPHS SANGAMUDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT v. BHOGADI KOTESWARA RAO, KRISHNA DISTRICT & 3 OTHERS

WP/3858/2007 · 2026-04-22

Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, Tuhin Kumar Gedela

body2007

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010439662007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE WRIT PETITION NO: 3858/2007 Between: 1. K.PANDURANGA RAO, ZPHS SANGAMUDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT, S/O.K.VENKATARAMAIAH WORKING AS GR.II PHYSICAL DIRECTOR ZPHS SANGAMUDI, KRATHAVENNU MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT 1. BHOGADI KOTESWARA RAO KRISHNA DISTRICT 3 OTHERS, S/O.SUBBA RAO SGBT TEACHER ZPHS MUNJULURU VILLAGE BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KRISHNA DISTRICT, AT MACHILIPATNAM 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION MACHILIPATNAM 4. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PARISHAD KRISHNA DISTRIC, AT MACHILIPATNAM Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed pleased to issue a writ of certiorari calling for all the connected records including the impugned judgment in OA.No.1598 of 2001 dated 21.2.2006 and IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 3858/2007 K.PANDURANGA RAO, ZPHS SANGAMUDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT, S/O.K.VENKATARAMAIAH WORKING AS GR.II PHYSICAL DIRECTOR ZPHS SANGAMUDI, KRATHAVENNU MANDAL KRISHNA ...PETITIONER AND BHOGADI KOTESWARA RAO KRISHNA DISTRICT 3 OTHERS, S/O.SUBBA RAO SGBT TEACHER ZPHS MUNJULURU VILLAGE BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KRISHNA DISTRICT, AT THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KAKINADA, AT THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PARISHAD KRISHNA DISTRIC, AT MACHILIPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be issue a writ of certiorari calling for all the connected records including the impugned judgment in OA.No.1598 of 2001 dated 21.2.2006 and IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3558] THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA K.PANDURANGA RAO, ZPHS SANGAMUDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT, S/O.K.VENKATARAMAIAH WORKING AS GR.II PHYSICAL DIRECTOR ZPHS SANGAMUDI, KRATHAVENNU MANDAL KRISHNA ...PETITIONER BHOGADI KOTESWARA RAO KRISHNA DISTRICT 3 OTHERS, S/O.SUBBA RAO SGBT TEACHER ZPHS MUNJULURU VILLAGE THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KRISHNA DISTRICT, AT KAKINADA, AT THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PARISHAD KRISHNA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the therewith, the High Court may be issue a writ of certiorari calling for all the connected records including the impugned judgment in OA.No.1598 of 2001 dated 21.2.2006 and 2 CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.3858 of 2007 the judgment in MA.No.1759 of 2006 in Rev.MA(SR).No.8125 of 2006 in OA.No.1598 of 2001 dated 24.1.2007 and quash the same as illegal, improper unjust, arbitrary, and contrary to law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 4911 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the judgment in OA.No.1598 of 2001 dated 21.2.2006 and the judgment in MA.No.1759 of 2006 in Rev.MA(SR).No.8125 of 2006 in OA.No.1598 of 2001 dated 24.1.2007 forthwith pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RAMAMOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR EDUCATION 2. N GURU GOPAL 3 CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.3858 of 2007 The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy) There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner in this old writ petition of the year 2007, when the matter is taken up for hearing today. 2. Therefore, it is evident that the petitioner is not evincing interest to pursue this writ petition. 3. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY _____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Date: 23.04.2026 MDP