APHC010057372007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:472/2007 Between: 1. MRS. REVATHI CHANDRAN,, W/O M.S.CHANDRAN, HOUSEWIFE, R/O GOVINDAPURAM VILLAGE, GUDIYATTAM, NORTH ARCOD DISTRICT, TAMILNADU ...PETITIONER AND 1. REGIONAL POULTRY FARM ANOTHER, MEAT & POULTRY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., REP. BY THE SUPERINTENDENT S.ANANDA NAIDU. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AT HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to prefer this Crl.R.C., aggrieved by the Sentence dt.30-03-2007 passed in Crl.A.No.72 of 2000 on the file of the VIII Addl. Sessions Judge, (FTC), Chittoor, in dismissing the appeal and confirming the conviction dt.03-03-2000 passed in C.C.No.221 of 1997 on the file of the V Addl. J.F.C.M., Chittoor. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(CRLRCMP 696 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may -2- CRL.R.C. No.472 of 2007 be pleased to dispense with the filing of the Certified copy of the Judgment dt.03-03-2000 passed in CC.No.221/97 on the file of the V Addl. J.F.C.M., Chittoor in the interest of justice. IA NO: 2 OF 2007(CRLRCMP 706 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the conviction and sentence Order dt.30-03-2007 passed in Crl.A.No.72 of 2000 on the file of the VIII Addl. Sessions Judge, (FTC), Chittoor, confirming the Order of conviction and sentence dt.03-03-2000 passed in C.C.No.221 of 1997 on the file of the V Addl. J.F.C.M., Chittoor, pending disposal of the Crl.R.C. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A CHANDRAIH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: -3- CRL.R.C. No.472 of 2007 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 472 OF 2007 ORDER: 1. Inspite of the matter is being listed under the caption 8for dismissal9, none appears on behalf of the Petitioner. 2. The instant criminal revision case, under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, has been filed against the judgment dated 30.03.2007, passed by the VIII Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Chittoor, in Crl.A.No.72 of 2000, whereby the learned Sessions Judge confirmed the judgment dt.03.03.2000 passed by the V Additional Munsif Magistrate, Chittoor, in C.C.No.221 of 1997 for the offence punishable under Section 138 r/w 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and convicted and sentenced the petitioner/accused to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of four months and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month. 3. I have perused the order passed by the learned trial court. 4. On careful observation of the findings, it appears that learned trial court has convicted and sentenced the petitioner to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of four months and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month for the -4- CRL.R.C. No.472 of 2007 offence under Section 138 r/w 142 of NI Act by fixing several points for determination. The order of conviction and sentence has also mentioned the evidentiary value of the witnesses in detail and the documents placed by the parties has also been scanned. 5. On a careful perusal of the observation of the learned trial court, it appears that the trial court has specifically decided the grounds of petition as mentioned by the petitioner, he has also decided on the point for determination. I find no illegality and impropriety in the order itself. 6. Considering the same, I find no justification to interfere with the order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned trial court. 7. Under the above observation, the instant criminal revision case is dismissed as devoid of merit. The order of suspension of sentence passed by this court during pendency of the instant criminal revision case is hereby revoked. Since the petitioner is not present before this Court, let a copy of this order be served upon the learned trial court for ready reference. 8. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Date:10.04.2026 Pmk -5- CRL.R.C. No.472 of 2007 220 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.472 of 2007 Date: 10.04.2026 Pmk