IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C ) No.11401 of 2006 Chairman, Board of Trustee Contributory Provident Fund …. Petitioner Mr. A.K. Pandey, Adv. -versus- R.P. Fund Commissioner-II …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.S. Mohanty, Adv. COROM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 14.07.2026 38. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In course of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that the Writ Petition be disposed of on the ground of no instruction, but liberty be given to revive the Writ Petition, if any cause of action still subsists. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the Opp. parties have no serious objection to the course of action proposed. 5. Considering the submission made by Mr. A.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the Petitioner, the Writ Petition stands disposed of on the ground of no instruction. However, liberty is granted to revive the application, if any cause of action still subsists by filing p. 2 p. 2 appropriate application within a period of 4(four ) weeks hence. 6. The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of on the ground of no instruction with the aforesaid liberty. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge sangita