Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2006 DAILYLAW 912 (ORI)

AINTI BEWA v. UNION OF INDIA.

WP(C)/13867/2006 · 2026-06-29

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

body2006

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C ) No.13867 of 2006 Ainti Bewa …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Dey, Adv. -versus- Union of India & Another …. Opp. Parties. Mr. P.K. Parhi, DSGI along with Mr. D. Gochhayat, CGC COROM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 29.06.2026 20. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- In the premises stated above, it is respectfully prayed that, this Hon’ble Court be gratiously pleased to issue a rule NISI calling upon the Opp. Party No.1 to 4 to show-cause as to why a direction shall not be passed directing the Opp. Party No.1 to 4 to accord appointment to the Petitioner No.2 in respect of the post against which the Opp. party No.5 was appointed and was subsequently removed and as to why such other benefits shall not be accorded to the Petitioner No.1 to which she is found entitled to, as against the services of her husband deceased Sudhanidhi Behera, and if the Opp. Party No.1 to 4, fail to show-cause, or show insufficient cause, the rule be made absolute, cost be granted; And for tis act of kindness, the Petitioners as in duty bound shall ever pray. 5. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner No.2 to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of 3(three) weeks hence. 6. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 3 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of 3(three) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 3 be communicated to the Petitioner No.2. 7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge sangita Reason: authentication of order