IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLREV No.756 of 2006 Gambhar Chhatria … Petitioner Mr. M. K. Das, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha 2. Bhaskar Nag …. Opposite Parties Mr. A. K. Pati, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 19.02.2026 22. 1. There is no appearance on behalf of the Petitioner when the matter is called. 2. Heard learned counsel for the State. 3. This criminal revision has been preferred by the Petitioner (informant therein) assailing the order dated 27.05.2006 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bolangir along with the prayer of the Petitioner-accused therein to be released under Proviso (a)(ii) of Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C., thereby setting aside the order dated 16.05.2006 rejecting the prayer for default bail in G.R. Case No.32 of 2006 on the file of the learned SDJM, Sonepur. 4. Ex facie the present revision is not maintainable since the learned Sessions Judge, Balangir, who has concurrent jurisdiction in terms of Section 397 and 401 of the Cr.P.C. has passed the impugned order. 5. Hence, the revision is held to be not maintainable. 6. Accordingly, this criminal revision stands disposed of. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Jina