111-3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9400-2006 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.09.2026 MOHINDER SINGH ..Petitioner Versus UOI & ORS. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocatefor the petitioner. Mr. Pardeep Rajput, Sr. Panel Counsel for respondent No.1-UOI. Ms. Preeti Grover, Advocate for Mr. Saurav Verma, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4 SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J. (Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the recovery order issued vide letter dated 17.11.2005. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that he has received written communication from the petitioner that he does not want to press the present writ petition. The written communication dated 25.08.2026 filed by the petitioner is taken on record. 3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. 4. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. September 02nd, 2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Ayub/Sahil JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAHIL 2026.09.03 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.