IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 116 FAO-4186-2006 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.07.2026 Sandeep ...Appellant Versus Munni and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Jivesh Malik, Advocate for Ms. Safia Gupta, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Paul S. Saini, Advocate for respondent No.3. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. This appeal has been preferred by the owner of the offending vehicle raising challenge to award dated 07.02.2006 passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Panipat. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that despite best efforts, respondent Nos.1 and 2 have not been served; further steps cannot be taken in the matter as the appellant has not responded to the communication sent from his office. In view of the above, he expresses his handicap and prays that appropriate orders be passed. 3. In the light of above facts and circumstances arising in the present case, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. (VIKAS SURI) July 14, 2026 JUDGE sumit.k Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No SUMIT KUMAR 2026.07.14 20:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment